Charter School Program (CSP) Grants to Developers for Opening New Schools

 
  • Grants Office Grantwriting service fee is currently unavailable for this grant
    Get more information on grantwriting

    CFDA#

    84.282B
     

    Funder Type

    Federal Government

    IT Classification

    B - Readily funds technology as part of an award

    Authority

    USED OESE Charter School Programs Office

    Summary

    The major purposes of the CSP are to expand opportunities for all students, particularly for children with disabilities, English learners, and other traditionally underserved students, to attend charter schools and meet challenging State academic standards; provide financial assistance for the planning, program design, and initial implementation of charter schools; increase the number of high-quality charter schools available to students across the United States; evaluate the impact of charter schools on student achievement, families, and communities; share best practices between charter schools and other public schools; aid States in providing facilities support to charter schools; and support efforts to strengthen the charter school authorizing process. 


    Developer Grants are intended to support charter schools that serve early childhood, elementary school, or secondary school students by providing grant funds to eligible applicants for the opening of new charter schools (CFDA number 84.282B) and for the replication and expansion of high-quality charter schools (CFDA number 84.282E).


    The Department recognizes these as being two different grant programs and applicants should apply to the program that best reflects their eligibility/needs. This summary reflects the Grants to Charter School Developers for the Opening New Schools (CFDA number 84.282B).


    Through CSP Developer Grants, the Department provides financial assistance to charter school developers to enable them to open and prepare for the operation of new or replicated charter schools or to expand high-quality charter schools in States that do not currently have a CSP State Entity grant under the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965 (ESEA). Charter schools that receive financial assistance through Developer Grants provide programs of elementary or secondary education, or both, and may also serve students in early childhood education programs or postsecondary students.

     

    History of Funding

    Previous awardees can be seen at https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-discretionary-grants-support-services/charter-school-programs/charter-schools-program-non-state-educational-agencies-non-sea-planning-program-design-and-initial-implementation-grant/.

    Additional Information

    Priorities: This competition includes one competitive preference priority from the 2022 NFP. This competition also includes an invitational priority to encourage collaborations between charter and traditional public schools or districts that benefit students and families across schools. Some of the most successful charter schools have collaborated with traditional school districts, and there is evidence that these types of collaborations can improve outcomes for students in both charter schools and traditional public schools, including by sharing instructional materials, creating joint professional learning opportunities, and developing principal pipeline programs. 


    Competitive Priority: Promoting High-Quality Educator and Community-Centered Charter Schools to Support Underserved Students (Up to 5 points).

    • (a) Under this priority, an applicant must propose to open a new charter school, or to replicate or expand a high-quality charter school, that is developed and implemented—
      • (1) With meaningful and ongoing engagement with current or former teachers and other educators (0 or 1 point); and
      • (2) Using a community-centered approach that includes an assessment of community assets, informs the development of the charter school, and includes the implementation of protocols and practices designed to ensure that the charter school will use and interact with community assets on an ongoing basis to create and maintain strong community ties. (Up to 2 points).
    • (b) In its application, an applicant must provide a high-quality plan that demonstrates how its proposed project would meet the requirements in paragraph (a) of this priority, accompanied by a timeline for key milestones that span the course of planning, development, and implementation of the charter school. (Up to 2 points). 

    Invitational Priority: Collaborations between Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools or Districts that Benefit Students and Families across Schools. The Department does not give an application that meets this invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other applications.

    • (a) Under this priority, an applicant must propose a new collaboration, or the continuation of an existing collaboration, with at least one traditional public school or traditional school district that is designed to benefit students or families served by at least one member of the collaboration, is designed to lead to increased or improved educational opportunities for students served by at least one member of the collaboration, and includes implementation of one or more of the following—
      • (1) Co-developed or shared curricular and instructional resources or academic course offerings.
      • (2) Professional development opportunities for teachers and other educators, which may include professional learning communities, opportunities for teachers to earn additional certifications, such as in a high-need area or national board certification, and partnerships with educator preparation programs to support teaching residencies.
      • (3) Evidence-based (as defined in section 8101 of the ESEA) practices to improve academic performance for underserved students.
      • (4) Policies and practices to create safe, supportive, and inclusive learning environments, such as systems of positive behavioral intervention and support.
      • (5) Transparent enrollment and retention practices and processes that include clear and consistent disclosure to families of policies and requirements (e.g., discipline policies, purchasing and wearing specific uniforms and other fees, or family participation), and any services that are or are not provided, that could impact a family's ability to enroll or remain enrolled in the school (e.g., transportation services or participation in the National School Lunch Program).
      • (6) A shared transportation plan and system that reduces transportation costs for at least one member of the collaboration and takes into consideration various transportation options, including public transportation and district-provided or shared transportation options, cost-sharing or free or reduced-cost fare options, and any distance considerations for prioritized bus services. 
      • (7) A shared special education collaborative designed to address a significant barrier or challenge faced by participating charter schools or traditional public schools in improving academic and developmental outcomes and services for students with disabilities (as defined in section 8101 of the ESEA).
      • (8) A shared English learner (as defined in section 8101 of the ESEA) collaborative designed to address a significant barrier or challenge faced by participating charter schools or traditional public schools in providing educational programs to improve academic outcomes for English learners.
      • (9) Other collaborations, such as the sharing of innovative and best practices, designed to address a significant barrier or challenge faced by participating charter schools or traditional public schools in providing educational programs to improve academic outcomes for all students served by members of the collaboration.
    • (b) In its application, an applicant must provide a description of the collaboration that—
      • (1) Describes each member of the collaboration and whether the collaboration would be a new or existing commitment;
      • (2) States the purpose and duration of the collaboration;
      • (3) Describes the anticipated roles and responsibilities of each member of the collaboration;
      • (4) Describes how the collaboration will benefit one or more members of the collaboration, including how it will benefit students or families affiliated with such member and lead to increased educational opportunities for students, and meet specific and measurable, if applicable, goals;
      • (5) Describes the resources members of the collaboration will contribute; and
      • (6) Contains any other relevant information.
    • (c) Within 120 days of receiving a grant award or within 120 days of the date the collaboration is scheduled to begin, whichever is later, provide evidence of participation in the collaboration (which may include, but is not required to include, a memorandum of understanding (MOU)).

    Contacts

    Porscheoy Brice

    Julius Cotton

    Julius Cotton
    400 Maryland Ave, SW room 278-44
    Washington, DC 20202
    202-245-6288
     

  • Eligibility Details

    Eligible applicants are developers that have:

    • Applied to an authorized public chartering authority to operate a charter school; and
    • Provided adequate and timely notice to that authority.

    Additionally, the charter school must be located in a State with a State statute specifically authorizing the establishment of charter schools (section 4310(2) of the ESEA) and in which a State entity currently does not have a CSP State Entity grant (CFDA number 84.282A) under section 4303 of the ESEA*. (Section 4305(a)(2) of the ESEA).


    Finally, as a general matter, the Secretary considers charter schools that have been in operation for more than five years to be past the initial implementation phase and, therefore, ineligible to receive CSP funds under CFDA number 84.282B to support the opening of a new charter school. 


    *States in which a State entity currently has an approved CSP State Entity grant application under section 4303 of the ESEA that is actively running subgrant competitions are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington. The Department not consider applications from applicants in these States under either Assistance Listing Number 84.282B or 84.282E.

    Deadline Details

    Applicants are strongly encouraged, but not required, to submit a notice of intent to apply by June 30, 2023. Applicants who do not meet this deadline may still apply. Applications are to be submitted by July 7, 2023.

    Award Details

    Approximately $4,000,000 is available in total funding. Awards will range from $200,000 to $400,000. The estimated average award is expected to be $300,000. Between 8-10 awards are expected to be granted. The project period is up to 60 months. Cost matching is not required.

    Related Webcasts Use the links below to view the recorded playback of these webcasts


    • Funding Classroom Technology to Empower Students and Teachers - Sponsored by Panasonic - Playback Available
    • Maximizing Technology-friendly Workforce Development Grants - Sponsored by Panasonic - Playback Available
    • Funding Data-driven Workforce Development Projects - Sponsored by NetApp - Playback Available

 

You have not selected any grants to Add


Please select at least one grant to continue.


Selections Added


The selected grant has been added to your .



  Okay  

Research Reports


One of the benefits of purchasing an UPstream® subscription is
generating professional research reports in Microsoft® Word or Adobe® PDF format
Generating research reports allows you to capture all the grant data as
well as a nice set of instructions on how to read these reports


Watchlists and Grant Progress


With an UPstream® subscription you can add grants to your
own personal Watchlist. By adding grants to your watchlist, you will
receive emails about updates to your grants, be able to track your
grant's progress from watching to awards, and can easily manage any
step in the process through simplified workflows.

Email this Grant


With an UPstream® subscription, you can email grant details, a research report,
and relevant links to yourself or others so that you never lose your
details again. Emailing grants is a great way to keep a copy of the
current details so that when you are ready to start seeking funding
you already know where to go